neural.love vs Pixlr affiliate programs
neural.love and Pixlr are AI image tools that both run affiliate programs. neural.love lists 20% for six months through FirstPromoter; Pixlr lists up to a 25% commission rate through Awin. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared. aifilliate records each program from a cited vendor source and does not rank the two.
| Recorded term | neural.love Verified | Pixlr Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 20% for six months | up to a 25% commission rate |
| Structure | Recurring | One-time |
| Cookie window | Not stated | Not stated |
| Network | FirstPromoter | Awin |
| Payout threshold | $100 quarterly | $50 |
| Terms checked | 2026-08-22 | 2026-08-21 |
| Source | Open source ↗ | Open source ↗ |
What matches, what differs
Differences
- Payout structure differs: recurring against one-time.
- Different platforms: FirstPromoter against Awin, meaning two dashboards and two payout schedules.
In common
- Both are AI image tools.
What these terms mean in practice
A customer who stays subscribed for two years pays out on every qualifying renewal with neural.love, and once with Pixlr. Which produces more depends on plan price and retention, neither of which appears in published terms.
Promoting both means two applications, two dashboards, and two payout schedules — FirstPromoter for neural.love and Awin for Pixlr, each with its own approval and its own minimum.
Which record fits which promoter
- neural.love: suits promoters building income on customer retention — qualifying renewals keep paying after the first sale.
- Pixlr: suits single-conversion pushes — one payout per referral regardless of what the customer does later.
What is not published
Anything below has to be confirmed with the vendor before either offer can be modelled. aifilliate records it as unknown rather than estimating it.
- Neither vendor publishes a cookie window.
How to read these two records
Both rates are stated as percentages of customer payments, so the figures share a basis. They may still cover different plans, billing terms, and eligibility rules.
neural.love pays recurring commission and Pixlr pays one-time, which typically matters more than the headline rate over a customer's lifetime. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared.
aifilliate publishes no ranking between neural.love and Pixlr. Which program earns more depends on plan price, conversion rate, retention, and refund reversals in your own audience — none of which appear in published affiliate terms. Confirm eligibility, paid-search and trademark rules, and payout timing with each vendor before promoting either.